Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Michigan News

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoHigh School MEAP Results Not Pretty
MIRS, November 5, 2003
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

Maybe Michigan's public high schools would have preferred the Michigan Education Assessment Program (MEAP) test results for public high schools had stayed lost. The data that was released today was not flattering.

Statewide, more Michigan high school students flunked each MEAP testing area -- math, reading, science, social studies and writing -- on the 2003 high school test than any other class in the last four years.

Whether it was by raw numbers or by percentages, the number of high school students failing the MEAP grew and the number of students excelling on the test -- with the exception of science and social studies -- fell in 2003.

To add salt to the wound, the MEAP results show that the percentage of graduating high school seniors eligible for the Merit Scholarship award is at its lowest point since its inception in 2000. Only 51 percent of the students (51,311) taking the tests qualified for the Merit Scholarship compared to the 54 percent (51,879) in 2002 and the 56 percent (48,760) in 2001.

Michigan's Chief Academic Officer, Jeremy HUGHES, tried to paint the biggest happy face possible on the dismal numbers, saying this was the first year of a "new, more rigorous" English Language Arts assessment, that combined reading and writing skills. Also, 6 percent more Michigan high school students took the test in 2003 than in past years, which probably diluted the talent pool, although Hughes didn't say that in today's press release.

"Although we're disappointed with some of the scores, they will help us gauge schools' strengths and weaknesses," Hughes said. "We certainly intend to get all students to meet or exceed the state standards. That is our goal and we will help our schools in getting there."

The MEAP results will be used to piece together the federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reports and, eventually, the state's Education YES! report cards. Schools were supposed to receive these results in late May or early June, but the state ran into delays with the two state contractors hired to put together a new state data recording system. These will be the state's first grades under the No Child Left Behind Act.

The most striking 2003 MEAP scores came out of the math tests, where 27 percent flunked, up from 19 percent in 2002. Only 16 percent exceeded state standards (down from 21 in 2002) and 55.8 percent either met state standards or performed at a basic level, which is down from 59.8 percent.

The subject that showed the least change over the last four years was social studies, a test that 42 percent of high school test takers bombed in 2002. Only a slim .7 percent exceeded state expectations and only 25 percent met expectations.

The most positive results came out of science, where more students (61 percent) either exceeded or met state standards than at any point during the test's four-year history. However, a record-high (23 percent) also failed the test. The rest scored at a basic performance level.

In reading, the 2003 test-takers set the low-water mark in percentage of those who exceeded standards (15 percent) and percentage of those who met standards (51.8 percent). Those failing reached a high-water mark of 20.5 percent.

It was much the same story in reading, where only an all-time low 4.6 percent of test takers exceeded standards and a three-year low of 56.3 percent met standards. A record 14.3 percent failed the test.

Again, 6 percent more high schoolers took the test in 2003 than in 2002, which tends to sandbag these numbers somewhat. However, it should also be noted that students had the chance to re-take the test twice, up until the spring of their senior year and these results show the highest scores each student attained.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Joint Adult Ed Committee Formed
MIRS, November 5, 2003

The legislature is launching a new bi-partisan, bi-cameral blue ribbon committee on how the state's adult education system can be restructured to survive the $60 million cut it shouldered during the last round of budget talks.

The committee's charge was approved by the full House on Tuesday in SCR 36 after Jelinek initially proposed the body's creation in the FY 2004 School Aid budget. Jelinek wanted to take a closer look at adult education funding after its $80 million in state funding was slashed to $20 million.

From the Senate side, Sens. Ron JELINEK (R-Three Oaks), Cameron BROWN (R-Sturgis) and Martha G. SCOTT (D-Highland Park) will join Reps. Bruce CASWELL (R-Hillsdale), Mike NOFS (R-Marshall) and Andy MEISNER (D-Ferndale) on a committee that will include nine other adult education professionals.

Jelinek is taking the lead on the blue ribbon committee and hopes to have a report put together by Jan. 1. The first meeting will be held at 4 p.m., Nov. 12 in the Senate Appropriations Committee Room.

"We need to look at adult education's focus," Jelinek said. "It's much broader than just high school completion or a GED. We need to look at delivery. We need to look at funding. Are there more ways, better ways, that we can qualify for more funding?"

Jelinek noted that family literacy and job training programs are important components of today's adult education. How these services are provided during tight budget times needs to be looked at, he said.

Doug WOOD, president of the Michigan Association of Community and Adult Education (MACAE), said the key will be building a system based on local K-12 schools, community colleges, non-profits, state agencies, faith-based institutions and other organizations or businesses pooling their resources together.

"With the recent cuts in adult education, there are some concerns that adult education could be eliminated," Wood said. "Nobody wants that to happen. Anytime you look at changing the structure of something, you have concerns and questions, but I'm happy with the representation on the committee."

Outside of the lawmakers, the committee will include a representative of MACAE, one member of the Michigan Works! Association, three local adult education program directors, three local Michigan Works! directors and the state director of adult education.

According to the resolution, the study group is being called the Family Resource Center Curriculum Joint Study Committee, whose mission is to implement a new integrated system of delivering adult education and related family services starting with FY 2005. The committee is allowed to spend up to $10,000 to carry out its duties.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Michigan School Pro-Ration Notice Expected; M.E.A Opposes Cuts
Gongwer News Service, November 5, 2003

Michigan's K-12 schools are expected to be notified by the Granholm administration on Thursday of a $349.7 million proration cut in their state aid allotments for the current year, worth about $200 per pupil, sources said Wednesday. That will begin a 30-day time period for the Legislature to consider alternatives or means to mitigate the reduction.

Meanwhile, the Michigan Education Association said its members will use the governor's budget forums to make a pitch to protect the funding for education at all levels.

The proration cut has been expected since the revenue estimating conference last month established revenue shortages in both the school aid fund and general fund. State law requires cuts in school aid when revenues are less than the budgeted amounts.

School groups have indicated they prefer the proration approach-a one-time move that keeps intact the goal of $6,700 per pupil foundation allowance-if cuts are required, but legislators and the administration have options to consider such as cutting or eliminating some spending on some other programs within education or moving some money from the general fund.

Use of general funds would put even more pressure on cuts in departments and programs supported by that money. And the governor has said she would prefer not to use the $22 million in state money allocated to a laptop computer program, but has not yet taken steps to pull the funds added through an agreement with House Speaker Rick Johnson (R-LeRoy).

In May, the House passed legislation (HB 4227) that provided for automatic school aid cuts, when necessary, to be done on a per pupil basis rather than a proration reduction of state aid. But the Senate, which was considering a different approach to eliminate automatic action, has not taken any action to date on the measure.

Sen. Ron Jelinek (R-Three Oaks), chair of the Senate Appropriations K-12 Subcommittee, said discussions on an alternative to proration cuts have not yet produced an agreement. There are some ideas, he said, but nothing finalized.

Mary Dettloff, spokesperson for Governor Jennifer Granholm, said issuance of a proration letter will merely set the stage for what has to be done to address the school aid imbalance.

"The Legislature has 30 days to offer an alternative and the governor would listen to what alternatives they would have to offer," Ms. Dettloff said. "It pains her deeply to have to cut education funding."

Indeed, the MEA says the governor and the Legislature should continue to honor the budgets for schools and higher education despite the revenue troubles, saying schools are already feeling the pain.

"Our schools, colleges and universities need to be fully funded," said Al Short, the MEA's director of government affairs. "When times are tough, education pulls us through. We cannot afford to balance the budget on the backs of Michigan's children."

He said MEA members will be voicing that message at the governor's budget forums and radio call-in shows and it will be a topic when the governor addresses the group's representative assembly on Saturday.

Ms. Dettloff said the governor understands the pain that cuts would mean for education, but said, "Everyone is feeling the pain and everyone is going to feel the pain. We have a structural imbalance in state budget that is significant. We would love to fully fund everything, but right now as things stand fiscally, it would be difficult if not impossible to fully fund everything."

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)