Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Lead Poisoning

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoLawmakers Take Aim at Lead Problem
by Wendy Wendland-Bowyer, Detroit Free Press, January 21, 2004
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

The Michigan House Health Policy Committee passed four bills Tuesday aimed at reducing childhood lead poisoning that range from requiring Medicaid HMOs to test more children to creating a registry of lead-safe rental housing. The bills parallel several separate but similar bills that are up for a third and final reading in the Senate. And while lead activists are thrilled by the bipartisan support of the package, some are also privately hoping the bills do not get tied up in committee, or watered down or passed without learning what does and doesn't work in other states.

For instance:

  • The housing registry bill that passed the House's Health Policy Committee on Tuesday only requires landlords whose property was built before 1978 to register if their rental was inspected by a certified risk assessor. Most rentals are not inspected by risk assessors. There also is no penalty for landlords who decline to register. Such voluntary approaches have not worked well in other states.

  • The HMO bill requires 80 percent of all kids on Medicaid to be tested for lead poisoning or the HMO will face financial penalties. This bill didn't make it out of the Senate committee last month because of the objections of HMOs. While it did pass the House committee Tuesday, the committee chair said it will be reviewed and possibly changed before going to the full House for a vote.

  • One other bill would set up a lead commission to evaluate the state's lead-poisoning prevention program and make recommendations to make it better. The fourth bill would require laboratories conducting lead tests to file results electronically with the state.

The bills were unanimously passed in the House on Tuesday, proof, lead activists say,interest remains high.

The bill that makes it a misdemeanor for landlords to knowingly rent a lead-hazardous property to a family with children passed out of the Senate committee in December, but is going nowhere in the House. It was sent to the House Judiciary Committee in October, where it has remained.

Legislators say they care about lead issues and want to protect Michigan's kids, an estimated 22,000 of whom are permanently poisoned by lead each year. They also say some give and take is to be expected.

"Lead is still a problem," said Rep. Stephen Ehardt, R-Lexington, who chairs the House Health Policy Committee and is a backer of a bill that would require lead tests to be reported to the state electronically. ". . . There are ways to solve it."

The bills, along with aplan to reduce lead poisoning announced by Gov. Jennifer Granholm in August, follow a yearlong focus on childhood lead poisoning by the Free Press.

Granholm created a study group to lay out a blueprint for fighting lead. The blueprint is expected to be presented to Granholm next month, said the governor's spokeswoman, Liz Boyd.

Michigan is not alone in its fight against lead poisoning.

Lyke Thompson, cochair of the Detroit Lead Coalition, has studied lead-safe housing registries in Maryland, Wisconsin and Boston. Wisconsin did a good job putting its registry online, as Michigan is proposing, but because it is voluntary, few houses are listed, Thompson said.

Maryland has made its registry mandatory and enacted strict penalties for landlords who don't register, Thompson said. This has helped them develop a good registry that is useful for municipal leaders, but not as easy for the public to access.

Thompson said he thinks Boston has the strongest registry because it is Web-based and all older properties that could contain lead paint are included -- including rentals and owner-occupied dwellings.

"Clearly, voluntary systems fail," said Thompson, of his research into other states. Michigan's registry has no penalty for landlords who don't sign up.

Some HMOs expressed concern Tuesday about the goal of testing 80 percent of all young children on Medicaid for lead poisoning. Dr. Fred Van Alstine, medical director of Health Plus of Michigan, said his agency sends letters to parents and physicians, and still children don't get tested.

"It is very difficult to get it done because it requires a blood sample," he said.

But testing all young kids on Medicaid for lead poisoning is a federal requirement. In Detroit, testing for children age 3 and younger has reached 80 percent, according to the Michigan Department of Community Health. Statewide, the number is 42 percent. Both percentages were substantially lower just a year ago.

Legislators hope to iron out the details of both bills and move them to the governor's desk within a month.

More Information

To get information on the lead bills, look up their numbers at www.michiganlegislature.org. The bill numbers are 5115, 5116, 5117, 5118 and 5119 in the House, and 753, 754, 755, 756 and 757 in the Senate.

Office numbers are in Lansing phone listings by legislators' names and under "Michigan, State of," House of Representatives and Senate.

If you're not sure who your legislator is, check with your city, township or county clerk. Write to your state representative at P.O. Box 30014, Lansing 48909. Write to your state senator at P.O. Box 30036, Lansing 48909.

Write to Gov. Jennifer Granholm at P.O. Box 30013, Lansing 48909, or call 517-335-7858, 8:30-5 weekdays. There is a recording for after-hours or when the line is busy.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)