Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Education in Michigan

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoNews From 1-13-04 Meeting of MI State Board of Ed
Including Return of Federal Funds, Ed YES! Appeals, and Mentoring
Gongwer News Service, January 14, 2004
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

While the rest of the state is worrying about trying to make ends meet, the Department of Education is doing its share to be sure that it brings in the maximum amount of federal money and spends all of that money, officials told the State Board of Education at its meeting Tuesday.

Deputy Superintendent Carol Wollenberg said there is always going to be some federal grant money that comes into the department but is never spent, but she said recent reports of millions of dollars of unspent money were essentially incomplete. While the department may not have spent all of the money it received in a given federal fiscal year, in the vast majority of cases that money is still available to spend in future years.

"The only thing worse than overspending is to not spend the resources we have," said Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Watkins.

Of the federal grants received by the department since fiscal year 1999-2000, $53.17 million has not been spent of $2.49 billion in grants. But of that, only $13.4 million has expired and is not longer available, according to a departmental report. The remainder must be spent before FY 2005-06 begins.

Roberta Stanley, who oversees the federal grant programs for the department, said in many cases the grants are intended for small districts that decide not to accept the money. If the law creating the grant does not allow the funds to be shifted to another district, the money goes unspent.

EDUCATION YES APPEALS: Chief Academic Officer Jeremy Hughes attempted Tuesday to steel board members against the criticisms that are likely to come with the release of Education YES! accreditation grades on January 30, a date he said the department is on track to hit.

Primary among the concerns will be from some districts that have, by default, had appeals of their scores dismissed. Forty high schools and 134 elementary and middle schools that argued their scores under the accreditation system or under the federal Adequate Yearly Progress measurement were incorrect will have to live with those scores, Mr. Hughes told the board Tuesday.

Though the schools had filed timely appeals of the department's calculations, they had not responded to the department's requests for additional information.

Mr. Hughes informed schools last week that they would have until the end of the day Monday to submit the information requested, in most cases proof that additional students had taken the MEAP who had not been counted by the state, or the department would stick with what it has.

If the information does come in over the next week, department officials will try to consider it, but Mr. Hughes said the department now needs to shift gears to putting the information into the report card format that will be released at the end of the month.

The department is also likely to take some heat, if not this year in future years, from some high performing districts that take a hit because of drops in their MEAP scores.

Mr. Hughes said the grade for change in average score does not account for the starting point for the school, so schools with the vast majority of their students scoring proficient on the MEAP tests that see their percentage proficient drop a point or two could receive an F on that measure while receiving As or Bs on all other measures. He said the department is reviewing ideas to resolve that concern.

Bases for Adequate Yearly Progress scores may also change next year. Mr. Hughes noted that under the state's current definition of a group, 30 students, there is not much room for absences on MEAP days. Federal law requires that 95 percent of all students take the state's standardized test, including 95 percent of any minority group within the school.

To ensure that 95 percent of a group of 30 students takes the test, no more than one of the students in that group could be absent on the test days.

Other states are using 30-student groups for determining percentages of students scoring proficient, but use 40-student groups for attendance measurements. The larger group allows two students to be absent and still meet the federal requirements.

The last round of testing also resulted in 3,087 missing test papers, Mr. Hughes said, all coming from Battle Creek, Beal City, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Pinckney, Portage and Saline schools.

As long as the missing tests represented less than 95 percent of tests taken in the school or district, the known scores were used to calculate Education YES! grades and Adequate Yearly Progress. If the missing tests represented more than 95 percent of the tests taken in that subject, the school would not receive an Ed YES! grade for that subject.

For AYP, schools missing more than 95 percent of their tests in a subject would be allowed to either provide other testing information on that subject, as some have, or retain their AYP standing from the previous year.

Mr. Hughes said the department will also have to work with districts over the coming months to clarify when special education students are required to take the MEAP tests and when they can take the MI-Access alternative test.

MENTORING STANDARDS: State law requires that all new teachers have a mentor assigned for the first three years on the job, but until now the Department of Education has not had standards for mentoring programs.

The new standards provide six requirements that mentoring programs must meet to be considered adequate under the law. Within the six standards are a variety of requirements such as criteria for selecting mentors, professional development plans for all new teachers, and assists new teachers not only in learning to teach, but in learning to work within the school culture.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)