Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Articles of Interest - Michigan

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoHigh School MEAP Likely Changing
Gongwer News Service, November 4, 2004
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

As the high school report cards were released from the 2003-04 school year, it appeared certain that the test on which those report cards were based would be changing.

The Senate Education Committee reported a package of bills Thursday that would require the Department of Education to replace the Michigan Educational Assessment Program high school test with a nationally normed test, at least portions of which could be used as a college entrance exam.

"We think a change in the high school test needs to be made," said Sen. Wayne Kuipers (R-Holland), chair of the committee.

While Department of Education officials, who had opposed the proposal as too expensive and not testing state standards, grudgingly acknowledged that the train had left the station, there was some disagreement over whether those tracks led to the governor's desk.

Sen. Nancy Cassis (R-Novi) said the proposal in the bills (SB 1153, SB 1154, SB 1155, SB 1156, SB 1157) was to be endorsed by Lt. Governor John Cherry's Commission on Higher Education and Economic Development, which has been charged with finding ways to meet Governor Jennifer Granholm's goal of doubling college graduation rates. "Now that the Cherry Commission is in support of this, my hope is the administration will be as well," she said.

But Ed Roeber, head of the MEAP office, said the commission was not endorsing a wrap-around test, which would essentially add science and social science tests to a national mathematics and language arts test. He said the commission report would call for an enhanced test, which would look more like a college placement test than a college entrance exam such as the ACT or SAT.

"What the Cherry Commission said is the state needs to redo the content standards and really raise the bar," Mr. Roeber said. "The standards that kids need to accomplish are far more rigorous than any of the three tests (ACT, SAT of MEAP)." He envisioned a test that would essentially combine the placement tests of the major universities, noting that students scoring well on entrance exams can still be placed in remedial math by the college tests.

Jim Ballard, executive director of the Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals and one of the prime movers behind the plan to use a standardized test at the high school level, said original drafts of the report had called for the enhanced test but that calls had come from the administration for the report to essentially endorse the Senate bills.

Mr. Ballard argued that, as the new standards the Cherry Commission is discussing are aimed at moving more students into and through college, the material in those standards should already be tested by the entrance exams such as the ACT.

The subcommittee working on the testing issue is expected to have its report to the full commission in the coming days with a final report from the Cherry Commission due in mid-December.

Liz Boyd, Ms. Granholm's press secretary, would not confirm whether Mr. Cherry or other members of the administration were backing the legislation. "This issue is of great importance to the governor and something the Cherry Commission is looking into," she said. "So we're going to reserve judgment until we hear from the Cherry Commission."

Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Watkins, who said he had not necessarily opposed the bills but had wanted to make clear the difficulties they would place on the department and schools, said the process was moving in the right direction. "We're working together to do it," he said of the department and the Legislature. "My goal is to make sure whatever assessment we use is going to benefit schools, teachers and especially the children. ...The state that gets education right is going to be the state that's going to rule economically in the 21st Century."

Under the bills as reported, the department would have to convert from the current MEAP test to a nationally normed college entrance and work keys test with pieces added to cover science and social science. Mr. Kuipers, chair of the committee, said the bills would be amended on the Senate floor to require the change by spring 2007.

The bills also would allow for dual administration of the current test and the new test one year to provide a baseline for determining both adequate yearly progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act and to set the cut scores for eligibility for the Merit Award scholarship.

Mr. Kuipers said he had worked with House leadership on the package and, while he expected some change, he said the bills should be able to reach the governor's desk during the lame-duck session.

The bills are also an improvement over original plans by leaving it up to the Department of Education to choose the testing vendor, Mr. Kuipers said. "We think the department is in a better position to make that decision," he said.

The bills would require the department to at least look at an online test vendor and would require that any test be approved by the U.S. Department of Education as meeting federal standards.

With the committee unanimously supporting the bills, at least in concept (Sen. Irma Clark Coleman (D-Detroit) abstained until all of the timeline issues had been addressed), Chief Academic Officer Jeremy Hughes asked that they also support the funding needed to implement the new tests. "It is going to cost more," he said. "I would hope that with the fervor and passion you had supported this issue you would support the department through the appropriations process."

He noted that the MEAP program has been cut each of the last three years and is already short funding it needs to implement new grade levels tests required under federal law. But he said the administration is asking for further cuts for the 2005-06 budget.

In the alternative to budget support, he asked for language that would allow the department to set aside parts of the program if there is not money to support them.

Mr. Roeber said the department was already considering dropping the social science test, which is not currently required under federal law, and the constructed answer parts of other tests to cut administrative costs.

And he showed department estimates that the new test would cost $10.89 million a year, while the current MEAP test costs $8.53 million.

But Mr. Kuipers said there would be offsetting savings by changing to the new test, including the time it takes to return scores. "I'm not convinced it's going to be more costly to do this testing than what we currently do," he said, noting that witnesses to the committee have said it cut administration costs for the schools.

And he said it would reduce costs to parents, who currently must pay for their child to take a college entrance exam.

Mr. Ballard also continued to question whether the department's cost figures for the MEAP include development costs, considering estimates that the MEAP office is over-budget from having to develop the new grade-level tests for elementary and middle school.

Mr. Roeber said a hidden cost of the program could be federal funds for schools.

While the federal law requires that schools show an increasing number of students performing in the proficient range on the test, he said ACT scores for Michigan students have not been showing those kinds of improvements. "They've been rock solid steady," he said. "My concern is it will set up high schools to fail more than they do now."

School Report Cards Contain Good, Bad News
Gongwer News Service, November 4, 2004

More Michigan high schools got passing grades under the state's school report card system, the Department of Education reported Thursday, while at the same time more schools failed to meet adequate yearly progress required by the federal government. The mixed message led Governor Jennifer Granholm to call the performance "unacceptable."

Worried that the performance could hurt Michigan's economic competitiveness, Ms. Granholm called on Lt. Governor John Cherry's Commission on Higher Education to find "bold solutions" to boost high school performance.

According to the Department of Education, 625 high schools out of the state's 937 high schools got state grades of "C" or better for the 2003-04 academic year. The year before, 507 schools got "C" grades or better.

But that improvement was offset by the fact that fewer high schools showed adequate yearly progress as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act. In fact, 75 fewer schools made AYP.

For 2004, a total of 501, or 53.3 percent of the high schools, made AYP. The year before the number was 576, or 64.6 percent.

Most of the 436 schools that failed to make AYP did so for poor academic performance. However, 89 of the schools did not meet the 80 percent graduation rate also set by the federal law.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Watkins said the results show the state has to do more to get students ready for college and 21st century employment.

And Ms. Granholm said the state has to do more to raise educational attainment. Failing to do so would hurt the state competitively.

The commission chaired by Mr. Cherry is supposed to develop proposals to double the number of college graduates in Michigan. But Ms. Granholm said that goal could not be reached if the state did not improve its overall high school academic performance.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)