Bridges4Kids Logo

Home ] What's New ] Contact Us ] About Us ] Links ] Search ] Glossaries ] Contact Legislators ] Reviews ] Downloads ] Disabilities ] IDEA ] Special Education ] Medicaid/SSI ] Childcare/Respite ] Wraparound ] Insurance ] PAC/SEAC ] Ed Reform ] Literacy ] Community Schools ] Children At-Risk ] Section 504 ] School Climate/Bullying ] Parenting/Adoption ] Home Schooling ] Community Living ] Health & Safety ] Summer Camp ] Kids & Teens ] College/Financial Aid ] Non-Public & Other Schools ] Legal Research ] Court Cases ] Juvenile Justice ] Advocacy ] Child Protective Services ] Statistics ] Legislation ] Ask the Attorney ] Lead Poisoning ]
 Where to find help for a child in Michigan, Anywhere in the U.S., or Canada
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
Last Updated: 02/01/2018

Article of Interest - No Child Left Behind

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids Logo5 States Want Out of Education Law
by Maureen Feighan and Christine MacDonald, The Detroit News, February 29, 2004
For more articles like this visit


The No Child Left Behind Act is only 2 years old, but the federal education law is already sparking a mini-revolt from some states.

Outraged by the law’s perceived intrusiveness, unfunded requirements and infringement on local control, at least five states, including Virginia, Arizona, Maine, Vermont and Minnesota, have either passed resolutions or are considering ones that rebuke the education law. Michigan, however, remains committed to holding schools accountable under the reform.

No state has officially opted out of the law, which would force them to forfeit millions of dollars in federal money for disadvantaged students. But several are taking steps to get out or calling on Congress to exempt them, arguing the law will cost far more to implement than they receive in federal funds.

Martin Ackley, spokesman for the Michigan Department of Education, and Elizabeth Boyd, spokeswoman for Gov. Jennifer Granholm, say there are no discussions of sacrificing the federal money to avoid complying with No Child Left Behind. Michigan receives $420 million in federal dollars that go toward helping disadvantaged students.

“There’s grumbling about (the law), but regardless of what you do, you’re going to have grumbling,” said state Sen. Wayne Kuipers, R-Holland, who chairs the Senate education committee. “It’s important for us to have an accountability tool that’s effective and gives us real answers. But is there some frustration? You bet.”

Utah’s House of Representatives passed a bill early this month that would’ve allowed the state to only implement the law where there is adequate funding. The state Senate has since put that on hold. Pulling out altogether would have cost the state $106 million in federal funds, said Utah Rep. Margaret Dayton.

“What we have not been told is how much it will cost us to implement all of the requirements of No Child Left Behind if we choose to opt out,” said Dayton in a written statement. “That is a serious question that has plagued all states.”

Sandy Kress, a Texas attorney who helped construct the law as former senior education adviser to President Bush, thinks most states are committed to No Child Left Behind. But the federal government could do a better job of pointing out ways the law could be more flexible, such as providing different ways to test special education and English as a second language students, he said.

In the end, he doesn’t expect many states to pull out.

“Most states are taking this seriously,” Kress said. “We are going to make it.”


back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New


Thank you for visiting

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to


© 2002-2018 Bridges4Kids