Engler Nearly Completes
Budget Work
Gongwer News Service, July 25, 2002
EDUCATION: The budgets approved by the governor include the latest
extension of school aid (HB
5881, PA 521), providing for a 3.1 percent increase in 2002-03,
and maintaining that level for 2003-04. The bill boosts the minimum
per pupil foundation grant to $6,700 from $6,500 this year.
The
budget provides $14.5 billion for school operations in 2002-03 and
$14.7 billion in 2003-04, representing about a third of overall state
spending.
“In the
face of declining state revenues and challenging budget issues, we
have demonstrated our mutual commitment to education by protecting
funding for K-12 public schools,” Mr. Engler said.
In
addition to the foundation grants, the budget also provides $314.2
million for at-risk funding including $3.7 million each fiscal year
for school-based teen health centers; $72.8 million for school
readiness programs; $95 million for intermediate school districts, a
3.1 percent increase over FY 2002; $40.8 million for vocational
education; $22.2 million for career preparation; $77.5 million for
adult education funding and $20 million for adult learning programs;
and more than $1 billion annually in federal funds to assist
low-achieving schools and to meet the new requirements of the No Child
Left Behind Act. The bill also provides $3.5 million for declining
enrollment districts in the Upper Peninsula for fiscal year 2003.
The bill
was also one of the few that Mr. Engler left intact in applying his
signature.
For the
Department of Education, the approved budget (SB
1103, PA 522) would provide $214.4 million ($27.9 million general
fund), including $946,900 for school breakfast programs, $50,000 for
scholarships for teachers to become National Board of Professional
Teaching Standards certified and $10 million in federal funds to
administer the Elementary and Secondary Education Act programs.
Though
Mr. Engler did not strike any funds from the budget, he struck lines
providing for a school health services consultant and allowing the
department to spend $50,000 on advertising for the Anti-Violence
School Hotline.
“The hotline itself has
been in existence since 2001 and I cannot support the use of scarce
state resources for promotional activities,” Mr. Engler said in his
veto letter. He said the tight budget also made developing a new
position in the department unwise.
COMMUNITY HEALTH: The Department of Community Health is now
authorized to spend $9.6 billion ($2.48 million general fund) after
vetoes of programs Mr. Engler said were low priority considering the
current budget crisis.
The
largest part of that budget, $6.3 billion, funds the Medicaid
program. “I commend you for protecting this essential program from
major budgetary reductions, even in this constrained economy,” he said
in his veto letter.
Mr.
Engler pressed Congress to approve a senior citizen prescription drug
program (this week, the U.S. Senate failed to muster enough support
for plans advanced by either Democrats or Republicans) as he noted
Medicaid costs have soared 160 percent since he took office in 1991
and now consume 25 percent of the state’s budget, up from 18 percent
in 1990.
“As
Congress continues to debate the issue, Michigan will spend $350
million this year alone to provide prescription drug coverage for our
165,000 seniors eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare. The time for
Congress to step up to the plate and deliver on their promise of
prescription drug coverage to America's seniors is long past due,” he
said.
Another
$2 billion covers mental health and substance abuse programs.
But he
did cut from the budget plans to create the MIFamily program to
provide some additional health care services to low-income families
that do not qualify for Medicaid. “I have directed the Department of
Community Health to delay implementation of the MIFamily program—a
Medicaid waiver that would expand the health care coverage and mental
health services to approximately 200,000 Michigan residents—until we
can be certain that we can afford to commit the necessary state
resources to this expansion,” he said.
He struck
10 programs, including provisions to allow community mental health
providers to carry forward funds and to fund a collaborative between
Michigan State University and the Michigan Farm Bureau to study
movement of animal diseases to humans, as “low priority initiatives”.
He also
struck provisions to provide funds to the Salvation Army for substance
abuse services, to six hospitals for bioterrorism preparedness, a
Battle Creek diabetes and kidney disease program, and to a consortium
of hospitals in Mid-Michigan for transition costs because the
provisions specified the recipients of the funding.
F.I.A.
: The state’s welfare and child protection services receive $4.07
billion ($1.17 billion general fund) under the Family Independence
Agency budget (HB
5645, PA 529).
Mr.
Engler struck language from the bill creating new programs within the
Child Support Enforcement System from an expected refund of federal
penalties. “These initiatives expand and create new programs and
could require FIA to enter into numerous small contracts that will be
difficult and expensive to administer,” he said.
And he
cut provisions for day treatment programs that required 50 percent
local funding from some communities while providing full state funding
for others. “This inequitable funding arrangement should not
continue,” he said.
He also
struck a six-month increase for foster care agencies and a
community-based child care pilot.
Mr.
Engler also welcomed $309 million the state would get under
legislation approved Thursday by the U.S. Senate under a national
fiscal relief program, saying it could go to the Medicaid Benefits
Trust Fund which was tapped to sustain some of the state’s health care
programs. “This would go a long way to resolving the issues in the
’04 budget,” he said.
Budget
Director Don Gilmer said estimates by the Senate Fiscal Agency and
others of a $1 billion imbalance in the 2003-04 budget are “within
range” as a result of revenue implications, but noted he cannot
calculate that far in advance the spending side of the equation to
come up with a total budget picture.