Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Michigan News

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoRoeber to Head MEAP Effort
Gongwer News Service, October 30, 2003
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

Edward Roeber has been named director of the Michigan Educational Assessment Program office in the Department of Education, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Watkins said Thursday.

Mr. Watkins made the announcement of the appointment to the newly-created position in the department before the Senate Education Committee as he said the state's goal in administering the MEAP is to not only avoid the timing disaster of the past year, but eventually to process scores fast enough that teachers and parents can see them the same academic year a student takes the test.

While it may take some time to accomplish that goal, Mr. Watkins said, it only makes sense that a "fourth grade teacher gets the data about a child when the child is still in the fourth grade."

Earlier this month, Governor Jennifer Granholm issued an executive order, 2003-20, transferring responsibility for MEAP from the Department of Treasury, where former Governor John Engler placed it, back to the Department of Education.

The test was mired in controversy this year because results were months late, with final results coming earlier in October, some four months after they were expected.

Mr. Watkins told the committee that both departments are working hard to make the transfer-which will be effective in December unless both houses of the Legislature block it-as seamless as possible.

Following the problems the state faced this year, it will not be easy to get the test results back on track immediately, Mr. Watkins said, but "our goal is to make sure we have the information on time, not six months later."

Because of the emphasis the federal government is placing on test results as part of measuring an individual school's average yearly progress-"the high stakes of 'No Child Left Behind,'" Mr. Watkins called it-the state is taking the responsibility very seriously.

Mr. Watkins praised Mr. Roeber as a "tremendous leader" in the testing area that has worked with virtually every state.

Mr. Roeber is now vice president for external relations for a non-profit company called Measured Progress, headquartered in New Hampshire. However, he has long experience in Michigan, having worked on the Michigan Accreditation Advisory Committee to help the state implement the Education YES! accreditation plan. From 1972 to 1976, he was a consultant for the Department of Education and then from 1976 to 1991 he supervised the MEAP.

From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Roeber was director of student assessment programs for the Council of Chief State School Officers.

In his new position, Mr. Roeber will be the state's chief assessment officer, Mr. Watkins said, and his position will be financed with federal money. The post will be a new position within the department. Marilyn Roberts will continue to be an executive overseeing MEAP.

M.E.A.P. BILL: The committee sent to the full Senate legislation, SB 787, prohibiting the department from assigning any accreditation score to a school if the school's MEAP test sheets were lost either by the school or a state contractor.

A number of schools in the state did not get their MEAP scores on several subjects because all or some of the tests were lost. Currently, those schools would still have to be graded by the state, but the bill would outlaw that until MEAP results in that subject for that school are compiled.

If the lack of the grade would mean the school would fail to meet the federally required adequate yearly progress then the department would have to request a waiver for that school from the AYP requirements.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Michigan House OKs Limits on Teen Drivers' Passengers
Gongwer News Service, October 30, 2003

First-year motorists would face potential limitations on the number of unrelated passengers they can have in their vehicle, but the restriction would have a number of loopholes under a bill narrowly passed Thursday by the House.

Supporters of the bill (HB 4600) say first-year drivers are most susceptible to accidents, especially when their vehicles are packed with friends possibly distracting them. There have been a few high-profile fatal accidents in recent years involving full vehicles of unrelated teenagers, notably the accident this year in Fowlerville that killed four teenagers in a minivan driven by a 16-year-old.

But the bill, which allows one unrelated passenger for first-year drivers, would not be a strict limit. First, the driver could have multiple passengers if they are family members. Second, the House adopted an amendment allowing the young driver to have more than one unrelated passenger if he or she possessed a note from a parent.

Beyond that wide exemption, there is the huge question of how police would enforce the bill if it becomes law-and opponents focused on that issue, raising the specter of police spending time pulling over packed vehicles of teenagers instead of pursuing criminals.

The bill, passed on a 57-43 vote, now goes to the Senate. Party lines dissolved as 18 Democrats joined 39 Republicans in favor of the bill. Seventeen Republicans and 26 Democrats opposed it.

First-year motorists ticketed under the bill would face a misdemeanor civil infraction comparable to the lowest-level speeding ticket or for failing to use a turn signal. There would be a $90 fine, but no points.

The most tangible consequence would be the delay in that first-year motorist obtaining his or her full driver's license privileges. Drivers ticketed for the violation would have to wait a year from the date of the violation to get their full license.

Still, bill sponsor Rep. Ed Gaffney (R-Grosse Pointe) suggested the bill is more about public awareness of the danger of teenage motorists driving with a packed vehicle. Police, AAA and others are planning a public relations campaign if the bill becomes law to make parents and teenage drivers aware of the risks.

"The thrust of this bill is educational," he said. "The thrust of it is not to put a lot of people in jail or to have a lot of fines."

Yet Mr. Gaffney said the bill "is a little bit more than a suggestion," saying parents would now be able to point to the law as added reason to prevent their children from driving with a packed car.

But opponents attacked the bill on two fronts. One, it would lead to an unnecessary police emphasis on pulling over teenage drivers who otherwise were doing nothing wrong. The other criticism came against the exemption for those first-year drivers possessing a signed note from a parent allowing multiple unrelated passengers with opponents saying it effectively guts the bill.

The Department of State dropped its opposition to the bill with the inclusion of the parental note exemption. The Michigan State Police supports the bill.

Rep. Sandy Caul (R-Mount Pleasant) said the bill would waste police time, but also seeks to substitute law for good parenting.

"This is a parental responsibility," she said. "This is a driver responsibility. This is not a legislative responsibility."

And Rep. Jim Koetje (R-Walker) said the bill is an overreaction to isolated tragedies. "Legislation should not be crafted because of one particular incident," he said. "There is no reason for these type of stops."

But supporters maintained the overwhelming evidence indicates the bill would protect young drivers and their passengers. "The long and short of this bill is that it's going to save lives," said Rep. Stephen Adamini (D-Marquette).

ROLL CALL VOTE: Here is the roll call vote on HB 4600:

DEMOCRATS VOTING 'YES' (18): Adamini, Bieda, Brown, Byrum, Elkins, Gieleghem, Gillard, Gleason, Hunter, Kolb, Meisner, Murphy, Paletko, Plakas, Spade, Tobocman, Whitmer, Wojno

DEMOCRATS VOTING 'NO' (26): Accavitti, Anderson, Cheeks, Clack, Condino, Daniels, Dennis, Farrah, Hardman, Hopgood, Jamnick, Law, Lipsey, McConico, Minore, O'Neil, Phillips, Reeves, Rivet, Sak, Stallworth, Vagnozzi, Waters, Williams, Woodward, Zelenko

REPUBLICANS VOTING 'YES' (39): Acciavatti, Amos, Bradstreet, Brandenburg, Caswell, DeRossett, Ehardt, Gaffney, Hager, Hart, Howell, Huizenga, Hummel, Hune, Rick Johnson, LaJoy, LaSata, Middaugh, Nofs, Palsrok, Pappageorge, Pastor, Pumford, Richardville, Robertson, Rocca, Shackleton, Shaffer, Stahl, Stakoe, Steil, Stewart, Taub, Van Regenmorter, Voorhees, Walker, Ward, Wenke, Woronchak

REPUBLICANS VOTING 'NO': (17): Bisbee, Casperson, Caul, DeRoche, Drolet, Emmons, Garfield, Ruth Johnson, Julian, Koetje, Kooiman, Milosch, Mortimer, Newell, Nitz, Palmer, Vander Veen

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)