Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Proposal 1

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoSupporters, Granholm Square Off Over Proposal 1
Gongwer News Service, October 18, 2004
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

Governor Jennifer Granholm accepted a check Monday from Lottery Commissioner Gary Peters representing a record contribution to the School Aid Fund. She said such a check would not be possible in the future if voters approve Proposal 04-1.

Proponents of the constitutional amendment to require statewide and local voter approval of any expansion of gaming in the state shot back that what would not be possible under their proposal would be the agreement they say Ms. Granholm and horse racing interests have reached to put slot machines at the state's horse tracks.

The Lottery officially provided $644.5 million for schools for the coming fiscal year, its first increase since a revenue peak in 1999. Mr. Peters said the increase was entirely due to Club Keno, which brought in $204 million.

"It was the most successful new game and the most successful Keno game launch ever," Mr. Peters said, comparing the new game offered in bars and restaurants to similar games offered recently in other states.

Gross revenues for the Lottery in fiscal year 2003-04 were $1.97 billion, so 33 percent of revenue went to school funding. Another 55 percent, about $1.1 billion, covered prize payouts, with the remainder covering retail commissions and other operating costs.

"This is exactly why it is so important that we should support every dollar that should go to public education," Ms. Granholm said. "If Gary Peters and the Lottery commission were unable to update the Lottery then revenue would decline."

And Ms. Granholm and Mr. Peters said provisions of Proposal 1 would inhibit the lottery's ability to change current games and to add new games because many of the new games depend on Lottery terminals. Mr. Peters said analyses of the proposal indicated those terminals are considered player operated electronic devices under the proposal.

"I'm upset that the tribal casinos and the Detroit casinos overreached in the proposal in affecting the Lottery," Ms. Granholm said.

But proponents said the only Lottery games that would be affected would be proposed slot machines or video Lottery games that have been proposed for horse tracks and bars.

"This is nothing but an attempt by the state to protect their foray into slot machines," said Roger Martin with Let Voters Decide, the ballot committee supporting the proposal.

And Mr. Martin said imminent approval of so-called racinos would be the only reason the horse racing interests would put as much money behind opposition to Proposal 1 as they have. In addition to being the primary bankrolls for No Casino Monopolies, the primary ballot committee opposing the proposal, horse racing groups are also supporting the Committee to Protect Our Schools, which is running the ads featuring Ms. Granholm and Mr. Johnson.

Let Voters Decide in fact launched ads Monday pointing out that Joseph Garcia, treasurer of the Committee to Protect Our Schools, is also the lobbyist for the Michigan Racing Association.

Mr. Granholm said her ads with House Speaker Rick Johnson (R-LeRoy) have to do only with the Lottery and its ability to implement new games. She said she does not support the current version of racino legislation, though she admitted she was not completely familiar with the terms of the current version of the package (HB 4609, HB 4610, HB 4611, HB 4612).

"It seemed to me to go too far, too many machines," Ms. Granholm said.

Ms. Granholm said it was her job to carry the message that any effects on the Lottery could mean cuts in school funding. "I think it is a realistic expectation that people don't want to see cuts to public education," she said. "If you removing funding from the School Aid Fund, you need to look at budget cuts or revenue increases."

Proponents said there would not be the press to have Ms. Granholm and Mr. Peters involved unless there was a deal on racinos. He speculated the proposal was needed to boost revenue in the fiscal year before Ms. Granholm seeks re-election.

"We're running against the state," said Tom Shields, also a spokesperson for Let Voters Decide. In addition to the ads featuring Ms. Granholm and Mr. Johnson, which are paid with ballot committee funds, Mr. Shields said Lottery advertising funds have been used to indirectly oppose the proposal with ads touting the contribution Lottery makes to school funding.

Mr. Peters said the Lottery regularly runs those ads in the spring and the fall. Fewer of the so-called beneficiary ads ran last fall because all of the ad money was tied up in launching Club Keno, he said. "Regardless of what's happening with the campaign we have to advertise our product," he said.

Lottery spokesperson Andrea Brancato said the bureau ran beneficiary ads in February, May, September and November of 2003 and February, May and September of 2002.

The ads about which Mr. Shields complained, which ended their run Monday, noted that Lottery revenues paid for about 11,000 teachers in the state. In October 2002, the Lottery ran ads proclaiming it generated $1.5 million a day for schools and in January 2002 it ran ads noting that local businesses receive some of the money spent on lottery tickets as well as much of the winnings.

Mr. Peters said if the proposal is only intended to affect slots and table games, the authors would not have intentionally made the effective date January 1, 2004, to avoid affecting Club Keno. "If Keno's going to be affected, then its going to affect all those games," he said of the games that require players to enter numbers into lottery terminals through play slips.

All of the games with player selected numbers use essentially the same computer system, he said.

Mr. Shields said Mega Millions, Keno and other games run through the Lottery terminals are existing games that would not be affected by the proposal, even if courts did rule that the terminals constituted player operated electronic devices. He said the effective date was put in to erase the possibility of arguments that the proposal would affect Club Keno, not out of fear that the game would be eliminated.

"That's what we're aiming at is where they're going, not where they're at," he said of the various proposals for electronic Lottery games at racetracks and bars.

Ms. Granholm also took issue with recent ads from proponents arguing politicians were supporting Internet gaming, a plan the proposal, they said, would put to the voters for approval.

"Internet gaming is a federal crime," Ms. Granholm said. "We have no intention or desire to have Internet gaming or children gambling."

Mr. Martin said Mr. Peters had proposed Internet gaming in a memo describing the effects of the proposal. The memo said, "The Lottery will not be able to introduce new 'on-line' games to replace mature games." The types of 'on-line' games the memo discusses are the Daily 3, Daily 4 and Mega Millions, all of which require a lottery terminal connected to a central server to operate, though not necessarily using the Internet.

And he said the Legislature has already approved Internet gaming. HB 4609, part of a package that would create the racinos, includes provisions for account wagering that would allow bets placed over the Internet.

But the allegation of politicians wanting to support online gaming available to children is noticeably missing from the list of gaming expansions the proposal would put to the voters in the latest ad the group launched.

DETROIT: Whatever the outcome of the campaign, it could further the rift between Ms. Granholm and Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick. Mr. Kilpatrick is supporting Proposal 1.

Ms. Granholm said she had not discussed the proposal with Mr. Kilpatrick. But she said, "I'm disappointed with anybody who's in favor of Proposal 1."

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)