Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

 Article of Interest - Proposal A

Funding Differences Between Schools will be Down $1,000 After Nine Years of Proposal A
Gongwer 9-11-02
For more articles on disabilities and special ed visit www.bridges4kids.org


The gap between the richest and poorest school districts will be cut by $1,000 by the 2003-04 fiscal year, a study by the Senate Fiscal Agency says.

By that fiscal year, when the reforms of Proposal A of 1994 will have been in place for nine years, the gap between the lowest spending school district in Michigan and the highest will be $5,254 per pupil, exactly $1,000 less than the gap when the Legislature enacted the Proposal A changes in 1993.

Reducing the gap between the state's richest and poorest school districts was one of the goals of the Proposal A school finance reforms.

In 1994-95, the first year that Proposal A dictated school finances, the study found the gap between the richest and poorest districts was $6,254. That year, the minimum per-pupil funding allowance was $4,200, while the highest spending districts spent $10,454 per pupil.

With the 2003-04 school year, the minimum per pupil allowance will be $6,700, while the highest paid district will be $11,954, the study says.

The reduction in the gap is due largely to the accelerated increase to the districts getting the minimum per pupil allowance by $2,500 over the period. The highest spending districts have seen their allowance increase $1,500 during the same period, or about a third as much as the rate of inflation.

That has caused some higher spending districts to call for changes that would allow them to raise revenues locally.

The question has worked itself into the gubernatorial election. Lt. Governor Dick Posthumus has mounted an ongoing attack on Attorney General Jennifer Granholm-the respective Republican and Democratic candidates-that her comments that Proposal A needs tweaking means she supports higher property taxes; for some time, she has said that only means aiding districts in getting low-interest loans and supporting donations to school-based foundations for enhancement programs. Democrats have charged that a letter written by Mr. Posthumus to the Bloomfield Hills School District showed he would back allowing local districts to increase property taxes. But Mr. Posthumus and the school superintendent have both denied that.

The analysis also said that because all of Michigan's 554 districts are at least at the minimum foundation allowance the gap between the richest and poorest districts has been permanently reduced. That will be reflected as all districts are now to receive the same increases annually unless the Legislature changes that formula.

The study also suggests that because of continuing budget difficulties, "it is nearly assured that the appropriations for FY 2003-04 (when the foundation allowance is to be held steady at $6,700 per pupil) will be revisited."

The study was published late last month as part of the Fiscal Agency state notes series.
 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.

 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.  

 

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)