Bridges4Kids Logo

 
About Us Breaking News Find Help in Michigan Find Help in the USA Find Help in Canada Inspiration
IEP Goals Help4Parents Disability Info Homeschooling College/Financial Aid Summer Camp
IEP Topics Help4Teachers Homework Help Charter/Private Insurance Nutrition
Ask the Attorney Become an Advocate Children "At-Risk" Bullying Legal Research Lead Poisoning
 
Bridges4Kids is now on Facebook. Follow us today!
 

 

Article of Interest - Michigan

Printer-friendly Version

Bridges4Kids LogoPartisan Policy Disputes Mark DCH Budget
Gongwer News Service, June 7, 2004
For more articles like this visit https://www.bridges4kids.org

 

Look for a multitude of proposed changes by House Democrats when the Community Health budget goes before the full Appropriations Committee on Tuesday, particularly in attempts to restore funds to the Healthy Michigan program and boost money for caregivers.

The $9.7 billion budget (SB 1063) cleared the Community Health Subcommittee Monday without debating the objections Democrats have to the bill, leaving the disputes for resolution in full committee.

Rep. Gretchen Whitmer (D-Lansing) said the budget includes some provisions that amount to bad policy and that will cost the state more money in the long run, particularly cuts that she said "gutted" Healthy Michigan and eliminated Medicaid support to caretaker relatives and persons aged 18-21.

The caretaker reimbursement program was pared by $26.8 million from the governor's recommendation, which relied on revenues from the proposed tobacco tax increase being used for smoking prevention efforts, chronic disease prevention funding and maternal/child health programs.

Instead, that money is to be used to reduce the amount of general funds appropriated for Medicaid services as the subcommittee proposal agreed with the Senate-passed version in restoring benefits for adult dental care, chiropractic services and podiatric services.

Ms. Whitmer said every dollar invested in Healthy Michigan services pays off by multiple amounts in future years.

Rep. Gary Newell (R-Saranac), chair of the subcommittee, said he, too, likes many of the programs, but a budget hole of about $100 million - accounted mostly from unrealistic assumptions of revenue from retaining the estate tax - forced the reductions.

"I'm co-chair of our health caucus and I'm a pretty big proponent of those kinds of things," he said. "It (Healthy Michigan) does save money in the long run, but when you eliminate money for dental services for older folks and you're faced with the option of allowing people to chew food or benefits that may pay off down the road, I'm going to go with allowing people to chew food."

The executive proposals assumed $94.3 million in revenue from the estate tax, but that proposal has been all but killed by legislative Republicans and Democrats concur its chances of approval are not good.

The caretaker provisions affect 34,000 persons and another 11,000 persons aged 18-21 would lose benefits under the bill, a combined savings of $119 million ($51.5 million in general funds).

"From my perspective, it's bad policy," Ms. Whitmer said, adding that courts shot down a similar attempt by former Governor John Engler because the Medicaid law had not been changed.

Mr. Newell said the cuts affect healthy persons and were among the difficult choices needed to produce a balanced budget for the department.

Ms. Whitmer also objected to about $27 million in savings that is embodied in the budget: $27.2 million with a 1 percent overall cut to be managed by the department; $27 million in an additional year of savings expected this year through Medicaid self-financing interest payments; accepting Senate language precluding nursing homes from passing through wage increases provided to workers; removing $36.6 million in savings in Medicaid pharmacy services; and stripping $225,000 from the Wayne State University diabetes outreach program.

Ms. Whitmer said the 1 percent cut is an abdication of the Legislature's responsibility and oversight for the budget.

But Mr. Newell said the provision gives departments more flexibility than if the Legislature were to dictate how additional savings are to be accomplished.

The governor's recommended Medicaid pharmacy savings, which had been accepted by the Senate, reduced the pharmacy dispensing fee, increased the average wholesale discount on brand name drugs, provided a 30 percent discount for generic drugs and implemented an optional mail order policy. Instead, the House version saves $2.3 million by increasing brand name co-payments to $3, limiting to four prescriptions per month for brand name drugs and assuming savings from a Warner Lambert settlement.

The budget includes $229.5 million to reflect a 3.3 percent growth in Medicaid due to caseload increases, $124 million for a 7.5 percent increase to HMO provides of Medicaid services, $29.3 million for a 2.5 percent increase to mental health providers of Medicaid services

The general fund portion of the budget is $10.1 million less than the revised recommendation of Governor Jennifer Granholm, $508.1 million less than the Senate (which did not build in the revenue from tobacco, liquor and estate taxes) and $187 million less than the current year. In total spending, the bill is $18.2 million below the revised executive recommendation, $8.9 million less than the Senate and $23.5 million more than the current year.

    

back to the top     ~     back to Breaking News     ~     back to What's New

 

Thank you for visiting https://www.bridges4kids.org/.
 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.

© 2002-2021 Bridges4Kids

 

NOTE: (ALL RESOURCES PRE-IDEA 2004 ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL/HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY)